Patients' Rights - Part 2

Image courtesy of Naypong/ FreeDigitalPhotos.net

Important evidence for the victim

A patient who claims to have been injured as a result of medical malpractice should proceed to collect all medical records. To prove the malpractice, it is valid that the patient should collect all documentations. If you have a suspicion that the doctor made a mistake during the treatment, before acquiring any help, the hospital should provide full medical records. In Britain there are many institutions that deal with the patients that are in any way harmed by medical malpractice.

Full medical records

First of all, the victim must obtain documentation from the facility, which made the mistake in the first place, in accordance ot the patient. You cannot base anything simply on the basic information packs. The victim should have full documentation, and not just the fragmentary portion. In addition, the patient should gather documents from the places where the patient was treated after the incident. It is on the basis of these documents that the the judgement will be made, defining how the overall life and health of the patient was affected.

What documents are specifically considered as the medical records designed to assess whether the treatment has been fulfilled with full care? You could point out the: medical history, the test results, medical observations, medical card orders, a description and report of the operation. Of course, various medical malpractices significantly differ from each other and to prove them, specific documentation will certainly be required. For example, you can indicate medical malpractices during birth – in this case, a printed out CTG is necessary.

All documents received by the patient should be certified for compatibility with the original document. The patient and any authorised person has the right to access health status and obtain photocopied medical records. The power of attorney may be granted a medical negligence lawyers by the victim at any time.

It should be noted that doctors have a duty to diligently carry out the medical records and the medical GPs should make them available for every patient. 

Patients' Rights - part 1

Image courtesy of stockimages / FreeDigitalPhotos.net

The most universal belief is that the patient may struggle to get compensation for bodily injury caused by an error in the art of medicine. However, in accordance with the principle of full compensation, the victim is entitled to total compensation, according to the harm caused, and followed suffering.

In case of damage or a non-performance or improper performance caused by the doctor to the patient, this patient has the opportunity to claim compensation for the damage that was caused to them, considering an existing obligation of the medical practices. This means the personal or object damages, therefore the victim may be entitled to compensation for the wrong doing carried out during the operation, or in other cases the costs associated with rehabilitation.

Equitable remedy

It is a compensation for the specific suffered injury. This benefit is meant to compensate for the both mental and physical injuries. The amount could be affected by many factors, such as age of the victim, a former way of life, and the negative effects of the accident. Depending on the country’s law, there could be no rigid schedule of charges for the amount of compensation.

The injured people most commonly redress the equitable remedy as a result of medical malpractices. The amounts of remedies could reach even hundreds of thousands of pounds. It is worth noting that, even if the insurer did not provide this benefit, is would be often useful to refer the matter to court. The question is - why?

A great example of the struggle for compensation of the damage sustained as a result of medical malpractices can relate to parents who filed a lawsuit requesting the compensation arrangements for their child. This specific boy suffered a severe injury during childbirth. The court initially granted over £35,000, and as a result the appeal (made by the parents), this amount increased to almost £60,000.